##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

Low creative disposition and science literacy skills, as well the lack of relevance of teaching materials, remain obstacles in the learning process. Learning innovation in the form of applying ESD-based electronic worksheets focused on used cooking oil management is needed. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of using ESD-based electronic worksheets on improving students' creative disposition and science literacy skills. This study used a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design. The research was conducted in a public junior high school in Yogyakarta with a population of 10 classes from grades VIII A to J. The sample used cluster random sampling, and grade VIII E was selected as the experimental class and grade VIII G as the control class. The research instruments included an observation sheet on learning implementation, a creative disposition questionnaire, and science literacy questions. The scoring techniques used were the N-Gain test, normality test, homogeneity test, independent sample T-test, and Cohen's effect size d test. The results showed that the use of ESD-based electronic worksheets for used cooking oil processing had a significant effect on: (1) creative disposition ability with a significance of 0.001, an effect size of 2.13966 in the very strong category; and (2) science literacy ability with a significance of 0.001, an effect size of 1.25231 in the very strong category.

Keywords

electronic LKPD ESD PjBL waste cooking oil processing creative disposition skills science literacy skills

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter: 77
Download Counter: 13
History
Submitted
Nov 30, 2025
Published
Apr 29, 2026
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
THE EFFECT OF LKPD-EL ESD PROJECT ON USED COOKING OIL PROCESSING ON CREATIVE DISPOSITION AND SCIENCE LITERACY. (2026). Journal of Excellence in Natural Science Education, 1(1), 24-43. https://jurnal.educatech.id/index.php/jense/article/view/39 (Original work published 2025)

How to Cite

THE EFFECT OF LKPD-EL ESD PROJECT ON USED COOKING OIL PROCESSING ON CREATIVE DISPOSITION AND SCIENCE LITERACY. (2026). Journal of Excellence in Natural Science Education, 1(1), 24-43. https://jurnal.educatech.id/index.php/jense/article/view/39 (Original work published 2025)

References

  1. Amran, I. J., Perkasa, M., Satriawan, M., & Irwansyah, M. (2019). Development of an ESD Character Learning Model to Improve the 21st Century Attitudes of High School Students. In Taman Siswa Bima National Seminar 1(1), 366-373.
  2. Anggreni, L. D., Jampel, I. N., & Diputra, K. S. (2020). The effect of the project-based learning model assisted by portfolio assessment on science literacy. Mimbar Ilmu, 25(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v25i1.24475
  3. Azzahra, U., Arsih, F., & Alberida, H. (2023). The Effect of the Project-Based Learning (PjBL) Model on Students' Creative Thinking Skills in Biology Learning: Literature Review. BIOCHEPHY: Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.52562/biochephy.v3i1.550
  4. Cholifah, S. N., & Novita, D. (2022). Development of guided inquiry-live worksheet e-LKPD to improve science literacy in the sub-material of reaction rate factors. Chemistry Education Practice, 5(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v5i1.3280
  5. Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2000). Describing 16 habits of mind. Alexandria, VA.
  6. Firman, F., Nurqalbi, N., & Hisbullah, H. (2022). The Implementation of the Talking Stick Cooperative Learning Model Based on Scouting Training in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Sinestesia, 12(1), 152–164. https://www.sinestesia.pustaka.my.id/journal/article/view/165
  7. Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2015). The global creativity index 2015. Martin Prosperity Institute.
  8. Grant, M. M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A middle school computer technologies journal, 5(1), 83. https://www.academia.edu/download/109882155/project-based.pdf
  9. Hoffmann, T., & Siege, H. (2018). What is education for sustainable development (ESD). Human Development, 1(8), 1-6. https://test.esd-expert.net/files/ESD-Expert/pdf/Was_wir_tun/Lehr-%20und%20Lernmaterialien/What_is_Education_for_Sustainable_Development.pdf
  10. Isma, A., Isma, A., Isma, A., & Isma, A. (2023). Map of 21st Century Education Issues in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Education, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v1i3.153
  11. Kamaruddin, I., Suarni, E., Rambe, S., Sakti, B. P. S., Rachman, R. S., & Kurniadi, P. (2023). Application of project-based learning models in education: A literature review. Journal of Education and Teaching Review (JRPP), 6(4), 2742-2747.
  12. Kebudayaan, R. I. (2014). Implementation of the 2013 curriculum. Ministry of Education and Culture. https://www.academia.edu/download/53852651/Paparan_Mendikbud_pada_Workshop_Pers_2.pdf
  13. Khainingsih, F. G., Suanto, E., & Hutapea, N. M. (2022, February). Design of Electronic LKPD Based on the PBL Model in the Context of Malay Culture Comparison Material to Facilitate Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills. In PRISMA, Proceedings of the 5th National Mathematics Seminar, 76-86
  14. Komalasari, B. R., Setiadi, D., Kusuma, A. S. H. M., & Jufri, A. W. (2024). The effect of the project-based learning model on biology science literacy in grade X at SMAN 7 Mataram in the 2023/2024 academic year. Journal of Professional Education, 9(2), 1237–1242. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v9i2.2232
  15. Lathifah, M. F., Hidayati, B. N., & Zulandri. (2021). The Effectiveness of Electronic Worksheets as a Learning Medium during the Covid-19 Pandemic for Teachers at YPI Bidayatul Hidayah Ampenan. Journal of Master's Education in Science, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jpmpi.v4i2.668
  16. Listiawati, N. (2011). The relevance of ESD values and teachers' readiness to implement them in schools. Journal of Education and Culture, 17(2), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v17i2.13
  17. Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in student creativity in school: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments. OECD Publishing
  18. Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: how teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 2. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x
  19. Maulana, D. D., & Djuanda, D. (2017). The Influence of Murrderr Strategy, Interest in Specialization, and Basic Mathematical Ability on the Achievement of Mathematical Thinking Skills and Creative Disposition of PGSD Students. In National Seminar on PGSD Education UMS & HDPGSDI Java Region, 263-281.
  20. Mayuni, K. R., Rati, N. W., & Mahadewi, L. P. P. (2019). The effect of the project-based learning (PjBL) model on science learning outcomes. Scientific Journal of Teacher Professional Education, 2(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v2i2.19186
  21. National Research Council, Division of Behavioral, Board on Science Education, & National Committee on Science Education Standards. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
  22. Ningsih, M. Y., Efendi, N., & Sartika, S. B. (2021). The effect of the project-based learning model on students' creative thinking in science learning. Journal of Science Education Innovation (JIPS), 2(2), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.37729/jips.v2i2.1403
  23. Noyes, D. (2000). Developing the Disposition To Be a Reader: The Educator's Role. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED470902
  24. Nuraini, N., & Waluyo, E. (2021). Development of instructional design for project-based learning integrated with science process skills to improve science literacy. Journal of Science & Science Learning, 5(1), 101-111. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/JIPI/article/view/2014
  25. OECD. (2018). PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework: Reading, Mathematics and Science. PISA OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264305274-en
  26. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. PISA OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
  27. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. PISA OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
  28. Ramdani, A. (2023). The Effect of Using the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Model on Students' Science Literacy. Journal of Classroom Action Research, 5(1), 210-215. https://doi.org/10.29303/jcar.v5i1.2925
  29. Rohmawati, Q. I., Siswanto, J., & Roshayanti, F. (2023). The Practicality and Effectiveness of Teaching Rotational Dynamics Concepts Oriented Towards Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) to Improve Creative Thinking Skills. Journal of Learning Innovation in Schools, 4(1), 193-200. https://doi.org/10.51874/jips.v4i1.75
  30. Suparya, I. K., Suastra, I. W., & Arnyana, I. B. P. (2022). Low Science Literacy: Causes and Alternative Solutions. Citra Bakti Scientific Journal of Education, (1), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v9i1.580
  31. Suryaningsih, S., & Nurlita, R. (2021). The importance of innovative electronic student worksheets (E-LKPD) in the 21st century learning process. Indonesian Education Journal, 2(07), 1256-1268. https://doi.org/10.36418/japendi.v2i7.233
  32. Syafitri, R. A., & Tressyalina. (2020). The Importance of the Student Worksheets of Electronic (E-LKPD) Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) in Learning to Write Description Text during Pandemic COVID-19. 485(Iclle), 284–287. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201109.048.
  33. Tahmid, T., Nurkhoiri, N., & Syaiful, M. (2024). Implementation of ESD-Based Science Learning Tools on Environmental Pollution Material to Improve Students' Literacy and Critical Thinking Skills. Diklabio: Journal of Biology Education and Learning, 8(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.8.2.235-245
  34. Tran-Duong, Q. H., & Do-Hung, D. (2025). The mediating role of student growth mindset between teacher feedback, peer collaboration, and creative thinking dispositions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101526
  35. UNESCO, U. (2014). Roadmap for implementing the global action programme on education for sustainable development. http://Unesdoc.unesco.org
  36. Watanabe, R. (2015). Implementation of education for sustainable development (ESD) in Japan. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm].
  37. Westwood, P. (2008). What teachers need to know about teaching methods. ACER Press.
  38. Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2009). Evaluation of practical guidance learning programs for educators and prospective educators. Pustaka Pelajar.