##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The proliferation of terms on social media used by the LGBT community for internal communication has given rise to code languages. This study aims to identify and classify neologisms related to gender and LGBT themes found in posts and comments on the Twitter account @darahputihhangat, as well as explain the function and role of these words in the realm of digital communication. The data in this study are linguistic units at the word level, collected thru observation and recording of uploads and comments during the period of April 2022. The comments used totaled 36. The data population consisted of 60 words, and 43 samples were taken because reduplication was found in some comments. The data collection method uses the observation-note method to gather the data found. Next, the data analysis method uses orthographic and referential matching methods to examine written language phenomena and the meanings/references they refer to. Finally, the data is presented in a formal format, which is descriptively accompanied by tables and charts. This study found 43 neologisms with variations in their formation processes, including clipping, borrowing, blending, reversal, arbitrary creation, hyperbole, onomatopoeia, and metaphor. The most dominant formation process was clipping (29%), followed by borrowing (27%) and hyperbole (18%), while onomatopoeia and metaphor were the least used forms. The research findings indicate that neologisms not only serve as markers of social identity for the LGBT community but also as a means of euphemism to soften potentially vulgar terms. Additionally, slang also serves as an internal language to avoid conflict. This finding confirms that gender and LGBT language enriches the Indonesian social media lexicon and reflects the sociolinguistic dynamics of today's digital society.

Keywords

neologism LGBT morphosemantics sociolinguistic

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Download
Statistic
Read Counter: 88
Download Counter: 20
History
Submitted
Dec 1, 2025
Published
Apr 29, 2026
How to Cite
INDEXICALITY NEOLOGISMS RELATED TO GENDER AND LGBT IN COMMENTS ON POSTS BY FOLLOWERS OF THE TWITTER ACCOUNT @DARAHPUTIHHANGAT. (2026). Journal of Indonesian Language, Culture & Literary Innovation, 1(1), 42-54. https://jurnal.educatech.id/index.php/jilcli/article/view/51 (Original work published 2025)

How to Cite

INDEXICALITY NEOLOGISMS RELATED TO GENDER AND LGBT IN COMMENTS ON POSTS BY FOLLOWERS OF THE TWITTER ACCOUNT @DARAHPUTIHHANGAT. (2026). Journal of Indonesian Language, Culture & Literary Innovation, 1(1), 42-54. https://jurnal.educatech.id/index.php/jilcli/article/view/51 (Original work published 2025)

References

  1. Hasni, M. A., Sudauruk, A. B., & Ramadina, S. C. (2025). Analisis Tindak Tutur dalam Komunikasi Komunitas LGBT: Kajian Pragmatik terhadap Pola Bahasa dan Makna dalam Interaksi Sosial. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendekia, 2(4), 3075--7824. https://doi.org/-
  2. Kaye, L., Hewson, C., & Buchanan, T. (2021). Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research (p. bpsrep.2021.rep155). British Psychological Society. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsrep.2021.rep155
  3. Rahayuni, N. K. S., Pastika, I. W., Netra, I. M., & Artawa, K. (n.d.). Indeksikalitas Teks Tuturan Politik Pilpres 2024 Natalius Pigai di Media Sosial X. Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 5(1), 189--193.
  4. Reiginayossi, M., & Sitorus, F. K. (n.d.). Bahasa Sebagai Cermin Identitas Analisis Perspektif Martin Heidegger. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Media Sosial, 3(3), 657--660.
  5. Santoso, J., Wahyudi, A. B., Sabardila, A., Purnomo, E., Tiyo, A., & Seriawaty, R. (2023). SUMBER DAN SIKAP BAHASA TERHADAP FENOMENA ARGOT KOMUNITAS LGBT DI MEDIA SOSIAL. Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25134/fon.v19i1.5830
  6. Sianipar, M. A., Zai, B., Gea Sari, W. E., & Annisa, M. (2025). Analisis Tindak Tutur Kata dan Ragam Bahasa dalam Komunikasi Komunitas LGBT. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Akademik, 2(1), 273--282. https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v2i1.3249
  7. Barli Bram, S. A. (2020). Indonesian Gender-Specific Neologisms. Indonesian Linguistics, 105-121.
  8. Holmes, J. (1992). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. USA: Routledge.
  9. Keraf, G. (2006). Diction and Style: Advanced Composition 1. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  10. Kridalaksana, H. (2008). Linguistic Dictionary. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  11. Pateda, M. (1995). Sociolinguistics. Bandung: Angkasa.
  12. Pradopo, R. D. (1987). Poetry Assessment: Analysis of Normative Strata and Structural and Semiotic Analysis. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
  13. Satriani. (2021). Neologism Thesis as a Representation of Indonesian Vocabulary Development: Morphosemantic Analysis. Makassar: Indonesian Language Graduate Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Hasanuddin University.
  14. Sulaiman, E, & Suhaimi, MEM (2020). Analisis Neologisme: COVID-19 di Negara Brunei Darussalam: Analysis of Neologism: COVID 19 in Brunei Darussalam. PENDETA, researchgate.net,
  15. Wijana, I. D. (2021). Introduction to Linguistics. Yogyakarta: TS Publisher.