##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This research or case study with observation is carried out to find out what learning theory is used in learning at Rumah Matahari Natural School. The purpose of this observation is to find out the learning theory used in learning at Rumah Matahari Natural School. This research is motivated by the need to identify and understand the learning theory underlying instructional practices at Rumah Matahari Natural School, particularly in learning environments that provide students with freedom to choose learning activities according to their interests. The type of research used in this research is descriptive qualitative research. Descriptive qualitative is a research method that moves to a simple qualitative approach with an inductive path, that is, it begins with an explanatory process or event that can finally be drawn as a generalization which is a conclusion from the process or event. The steps for collecting qualitative descriptive data involve three stages, namely data reduction, data display and drawing conclusions. Make direct observations of the way children learn who are given the freedom to choose a way of learning according to their interests. In accordance with constructivist learning theory where this theory handles the saturation of students by increasing the active participation of students during the learning process. This constructivist learning theory can make students think more critically in the learning process and be more creative in expressing opinions and in expressing ideas.

Keywords

learning constructivism natural school observation

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Download
Statistic
Read Counter: 23
Download Counter: 23
History
Submitted
Dec 12, 2025
Published
Feb 5, 2026
How to Cite
ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTIVIST LEARNING THEORY IN THE LEARNING PROCESS AT RUMAH MATAHARI NATURAL SCHOOL. (2026). Journal of Global Innovations in Primary Teacher Education, 1(1), 23-29. https://jurnal.educatech.id/index.php/jgipte/article/view/61

How to Cite

ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTIVIST LEARNING THEORY IN THE LEARNING PROCESS AT RUMAH MATAHARI NATURAL SCHOOL. (2026). Journal of Global Innovations in Primary Teacher Education, 1(1), 23-29. https://jurnal.educatech.id/index.php/jgipte/article/view/61

References

  1. Aminullah. (2018). PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR BIOLOGI POKOKPEMBAHASAN SISTEM REPRODUKSI MANUSIA BERBASIS KONSTRUKTIVISME PADA SISWA KELAS XI SMA NEGERI 1BARAKA KABUPATEN ENREKANG: 13--21. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(2).
  2. Ardiansyah, W., & Ujihanti, M. (2017). Constructivism and Its Perspectives Related to Teaching And Learning Process In The Classroom: A Conceptual Framework. Tarbawy : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v4i1.815
  3. Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1994). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13(1), 105–122.
  4. Hidayat D, S. E. (2020). Implementasi Teori Belajar Konstruktivistik dalam Pembelajaran IPS Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa di SMP Muhammadiyah 4 sambi. Buletin Literasi Budaya Sekolah, 169—174.
  5. Hullatul Luthfiyah, Radeni Sukma Indra Dewi, & Ratna Ekawati. (2024). Membangun Jembatan Pengetahuan: Menyelami Dampak Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran IPAS di Sekolah Dasar. Inovasi Sekolah Dasar: Jurnal Kajian Pengembangan Pendidikan, 11(2), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.36706/jisd.v11i2.66
  6. Khairani M, Y. (n.d.). Efektifitas Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Matematika Diskrit Berbasis Konstruktivisme. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 100—107.
  7. Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
  8. Romdhon, J., Masrifah, M., Shiyama, N. M., & Suharyati, H. (2024). Applying Constructivist Learning Theory to Enhance Student Learning Outcomes in Elementary Schools. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Future Society, 2(2), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.62157/ijsdfs.v2i2.73
  9. Rosita, R., Safitri, R. D., Suwarma, D. M., Muyassaroh, I., & Jenuri, J. (2024). Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa SD. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Hasil Penelitian, 10(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpd.v10n3.p238-247
  10. Saminan, S., Risa, N., & Hamid, T. (2017). Implementation of ARIAS Learning Model Integrated With Constructivist Theory to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 5(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v5i2.124
  11. Sujarwanto, -. (2016). PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONSTRUKTIVISME PADA MATERI CIRI-CIRI MAHLUK HIDUP DI KELAS III A SD NEGERI KEPUTRAN. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v3i1.2357
  12. Suparlan, S. (2019). Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran. ISLAMIKA, 1(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v1i2.208
  13. Suwandayani, B. I., Kuncahyono, & Ika Anggraini, A. (2021). POLA IMPLEMENTASI TEORI KONSTRUKTIVISME PADA PEMBELAJARAN TATAP MUKA TERBATAS DI SEKOLAH DASAR. Taman Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 5(2), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.30738/tc.v5i2.11472
  14. Waseso, H. P. (2018). Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Prespektif Teori Pembelajaran Konstruktivis. TA’LIM : Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.52166/talim.v1i1.632
  15. Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist Learning Theory and Creating Effective Learning Environments. In J. Zajda, Globalisation and Education Reforms (Vol. 25, pp. 35–50). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
  16. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.