##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This research aims to find out how expressive speech acts are in the Ziva 
Expressive Speech Act Magnolya and Tiara Andini edition of the Viniar 
podcast and to find out the relationship between expressive speech acts in the 
Ziva Magnolia and Tiara Andini edition of the Viniar Podcast with the 9th 
grade Middle School Response Text teaching materials KD 3.7 and 4.7. The 
method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The technique used is 
listening and writing. The types of expressive speech acts found in this 
research are (1) expressive speech acts of apology totaling 4 data, (2) 
expressive speech acts of saying thank you amounting to 5 data points, (3) 
expressive speech acts of praise, totaling 9 data points, (4) expressive 
expressive speech acts of blaming totaling 3 data, and (5) expressive speech 
acts of mocking totaling 8 data. This means that in the Ziva Magnolya and 
Tiara Andini edition of the Viniar video podcast broadcast on YouTube, 29 
pieces of data were found to use expressive speech acts. It is hoped that this 
research can become a reference for other researchers to study in more depth 
related to expressive speech acts in discourse analysis. 

Keywords

Expressive Speech Acts, Response Text, Podcast

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter: 69
Download Counter: 52
History
Submitted
Nov 30, 2025
Published
Dec 16, 2025
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
ANALYSIS OF EXPRESSIVE SPEECH ACTS IN THE PODCAST VINIAR EDITION ZIVA MAGNOLYA AND TIARA ANDINI ON YOUTUBE. (2025). Frontiers in English Language and Literature Education, 1(1), 35-41. https://jurnal.educatech.id/index.php/felle/article/view/32

How to Cite

ANALYSIS OF EXPRESSIVE SPEECH ACTS IN THE PODCAST VINIAR EDITION ZIVA MAGNOLYA AND TIARA ANDINI ON YOUTUBE. (2025). Frontiers in English Language and Literature Education, 1(1), 35-41. https://jurnal.educatech.id/index.php/felle/article/view/32

References

  1. Aliyah, S. (2019). Representasi kekuasaan dalam teks wacana birokrasi. Jurnal
  2. Sosiohumaniora, 21(3), 211–223
  3. Astuti, W. (2023). Analisis wacana kritis pada pemberitaan media daring Indonesia.
  4. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 8(2), 101–112.
  5. Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2015). Corpora and discourse studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and political discourse: A CDA approach. Journal of
  7. Language and Politics, 9(3), 412–431.
  8. Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2017). The discourse of news values. Oxford University
  9. Press.
  10. Bhatia, V. K. (2017). Critical genre analysis. Journal of English for Academic
  11. Purposes, 27, 32–44.
  12. Blommaert, J. (2020). Language, ideology and discourse analysis. Annual Review of
  13. Anthropology, 49, 27–45.
  14. Cap, P. (2017). The language of fear: Communicating threat in public discourse.
  15. Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Cheng, W. (2013). Exploring corpus linguistics. Routledge.
  17. Chiluwa, I. (2020). Online media and discourse studies in Africa. Discourse & Society,
  18. 31(6), 670–688.
  19. Ekström, M. (2016). Media discourse and social power. Discourse, Context & Media,
  20. 13, 1–8.
  21. Fang, Y. (2020). Critical analysis of political speeches. Lingua, 235, 102–155.
  22. Flowerdew, J. (2014). Discourse in English language education. Routledge.
  23. Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method.
  24. Routledge.
  25. Handayani, R. (2021). Analisis wacana pemberitaan kebijakan pendidikan di media
  26. daring. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 9(2), 176–188.
  27. Hart, C. (2018). Cognitive linguistics and critical discourse studies. Palgrave
  28. Communications, 4(1), 1–12.
  29. Herdiyanti, A. (2023). Penggunaan multimodalitas dalam wacana kampanye digital.
  30. Jurnal Komunikasi Visual, 5(1), 27–39.
  31. Page | 9
  32. Frontiers in English Language and Literature Education
  33. Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. Sage
  34. Handbook of Digital Technology Research.
  35. Kim, H. (2022). Multimodal framing in news discourse. Journalism Studies, 23(7),
  36. 865–883.
  37. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design.
  38. Routledge.
  39. Kurniawati, D. (2020). Bahasa dan ideologi dalam teks editorial surat kabar. Jurnal
  40. Bahasa & Wacana, 6(1), 1–15.
  41. Lai, C. (2022). Framing and representation in multimodal social media texts.
  42. Telematics and Informatics, 68, 101–736.
  43. Lestari, M. (2019). Multimodalitas dalam analisis wacana teks iklan digital. Jurnal
  44. Semiotics Indonesia, 3(2), 45–57.
  45. Liu, Q. (2023). Representations of identity in online discourse. Social Semiotics, 33(2),
  46. 125–143.
  47. Machin, D. (2016). The need for a social and critical account of multimodal
  48. communication. Multimodal Communication, 5(2), 173–185.
  49. Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). Critical discourse analysis: A multimodal approach.
  50. Sage.
  51. Márquez-Reiter, R., & Bou-Franch, P. (2017). Pragmatics in digital communication.
  52. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 1–6.
  53. Nartey, M., & Mwinlaaru, I. N. (2019). Critical discourse analysis and its application
  54. to political discourse. Language & Communication, 65, 22–34.
  55. Nguyen, Q. (2021). Analyzing ideologies in online discourse. Journal of Pragmatics,
  56. 171, 87–101.
  57. Nugroho, A. (2023). Representasi identitas dalam wacana media sosial. Jurnal Ilmiah
  58. Bahasa dan Sastra, 9(1), 87–98.
  59. O’Halloran, K. L. (2011). Multimodal discourse analysis. Companion to Discourse,
  60. 120–137.
  61. O'Keeffe, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics and media discourse. Continuum.
  62. Oktaviani, R., & Kurniawan, T. (2021). Struktur wacana dan kekuasaan dalam pidato
  63. kenegaraan. Jurnal Pragmatik, 4(2), 65–76.
  64. Park, S. (2021). Media representation and discourse ideology. Communication &
  65. Society, 34(3), 45–60.
  66. Pennycook, A. (2018). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Routledge.
  67. Pratiwi, D. (2021). Strategi bahasa dalam wacana politik pada pemilihan umum. Jurnal
  68. Linguistik Terapan, 7(3), 143–152.
  69. Putri, H. R. (2022). Analisis wacana media pada representasi konflik sosial di
  70. Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Nusantara, 4(2), 33–47.
  71. Rahmawati, S. (2020). Analisis wacana kritis model Fairclough pada berita pandemi
  72. COVID-19. Jurnal Wacana Media, 5(1), 22–35.
  73. Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers: An approach from critical discourse
  74. analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
  75. Sari, N. L., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Representasi perempuan dalam teks berita media
  76. online. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 11(1), 55–68.
  77. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourse in place: Language in the material
  78. world. Routledge.
  79. Simanjuntak, J. (2022). Analisis wacana kritis terhadap isu lingkungan dalam
  80. pemberitaan nasional. Jurnal Green Communication, 7(2), 55–66.
  81. Syafril, M. (2020). Strategi pragmatik dalam wacana humor media sosial Indonesia.
  82. Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 38(1), 62–75.
  83. Page | 10
  84. Frontiers in English Language and Literature Education
  85. van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach.
  86. Discourse & Society, 26(1), 65–78.
  87. Weninger, C. (2017). Multimodal approaches in discourse studies. Language and
  88. Education, 31(1), 1–5.
  89. Widodo, S. (2024). Praktik representasi identitas budaya dalam video pendek TikTok.
  90. Jurnal Media dan Budaya, 2(1), 12–28.
  91. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage
  92. Publications.
  93. Zhao, S. (2022). Multimodal discourse analysis of media texts. Discourse &
  94. Communication, 16(3), 345–362.
  95. Zhao, Y. (2023). Representation in digital media discourse. Digital Journalism, 11(4),
  96. 567–584.